Category Archives: Production year

What year was the episode or film released

“Tomorrow is Yesterday”

Fellini_questions_Kirk
“Wait, did you say 200 years? That won’t work — can you lock me up for 300?”

An accident hurls theĀ Enterprise back in time to Earth, circa 1969, where it’s spotted in theĀ atmosphere by an Air Force pilot sent to investigate a report of a UFO. Kirk accidentally crushes the plane with a tractor beam (good one, Jimmy) and is forced to beam the pilot, Captain John Christopher (Roger Perry) aboard. Kirk and Spock must deal with Christopher in a way least damaging to the timeline. They’ve also got to find a way to get the Enterprise and her crew back home. After initially determining Christopher isn’t historically relevant — which Spock TELLS Christopher in a kind of harsh scene —Ā the crew later learns Christopher’sĀ unborn son will be historically significant, so he needs to go back, Jack Shephard-style.Ā The crew first must recover some photos from Christopher’s plane, leading to Kirk briefly getting captured at an Air Force base. After rescuing Kirk,Ā the crew determines they can slingshot the ship around the sun to go back in time (or something) to return Christopher and a security guard they beamed up Ā during the photo-recovery mission and then get back to their own time.

Yes, yeasdfklajsd;fkasdf
“That’ll be the last time Scotty makes me watch clips from his trip to Wrigley’s Pleasure Planet.”

Why itā€™s important

Other than the goofy business at the end of “The Naked Time” — which, kinda probably could have been part one of this episode — this is the franchise’s first foray into time travel. Admittedly, it’s questionable as to whether this is enough to make the episode historically importantĀ under this site’s guidelines —Ā would a history text about Star Trek include this incident or even be able to record it? — but it’s significantĀ in a creative sense. Without this episode, one wonders if we’d have seen classics such as “The City on the Edge of Forever,” “Yesterday’s Enterprise” or “The Visitor.” Of course, it would have likely saved us from the Temporal Cold War nonsense on Enterprise, but you take the good and you take the bad, as Mrs. Garrett would say.

Even if this episode isĀ borderline significant,Ā it’s extremely interesting to watch Kirk and Co. as they get their arms around what kind of roles they might play if they interfere with the timeline. It’s almost on an elementary level. Once Christopher’s aboard the Enterprise, Kirk lets him just walk the ship — something that later captains likely would have prohibited. Spock actually has to point out to Kirk why letting Christopher see so much is a problem! Later, Spock only has the presence of mind to check for Christopher’s name in the historical records, and not his offspring. This is something thatĀ Kirk and Spock would have been all over even by the second season, but here, they really don’t get it yet.

Oh, and of course, the method for time travel seen here is what we (mostly) see in “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home”.

KirkChristopher
“This is all very disconcerting, Captain Kirk. But I’m sure I’ll be good with it in like 5 minutes.”

What doesn’t hold up well

This episode shows another example, or a possible example, of how the Star Trek creators were overly optimistic about how far mankind would getĀ in the latter part of the 20th centuryĀ when it cameĀ to space travel. Christopher’s son, Sean, turns out to beĀ historically significantĀ because he was on the first missionĀ to Saturn. Now, as of this writing, there are no plans for that to happen.

It’s, of course, possible that Sean was born much later in Christopher’s life — say, 30 years after the events of this episode.Ā That would make Christopher about 60 when Sean would have been born and Sean about 15 as of this writing. That means Sean could end up being on a mission to Saturn sometimeĀ after 2025 or so.

Regardless, the big question is, how likely is it that man will send anyone to Saturn sometime in the next 30 years? Based on the scuttling of the shuttle program in the early 2010s, I’d say it’s pretty unlikely. And based on eventsĀ from other episodes — notably Khan leaving Earth in a fairly sophisticated spacecraft in 1996 — I doubtĀ the creators were expecting Sean’s mission to take place so late in the 21st century. The idea almost certainly was that Sean would be born relatively soon after this episode and been involved in a mission to Saturn before the end of the 20th century.

The other big issue in this episode is the ending. Putting aside the slingshot business and the logistics of the final scene — if the Enterprise is traveling at warp, how does it have several minutes to beam Christopher and the security guard to Earth? — whyĀ was it necessary to beam them both down? Shouldn’t they just have vanished from the Enterprise when Christopher’s plane wasn’t destroyed? Shouldn’t the Christopher in theĀ jet have been the one to stay? And, where did the one who was in the cockpit go? Same question for the guard.

Like I said: The creators were clearly getting their arms around time travel here.

Final thoughts

I know I’m being hard onĀ an episode that almost deserves pilot-level (no pun intended) treatment. In all honesty, IĀ like “Tomorrow is Yesterday”Ā a lot.Ā NimoyĀ found theĀ right notes as NimoyĀ and particularly Shatner might have turned in one of his best performances. His scenes with Christopher are great, and the interrogation where Kirk calmly refuses to provide any information to the Air Force officers who captured him was pitch-perfect. Gregarious-but-authoritative Kirk is one of the things Shatner did very well. He doesn’t bark at Christopher as to why they can’t just send him back to Earth. He explains it calmly, but it’s clear who’s in charge.

And Perry as Christopher is good, too. Granted, he’s a little too composed for someone who’s just been beamed aboard a space ship, learned of alien life and been told he can never go home. But, he’s an interesting character if you swallow he’s that strong a person.

Meanwhile, Kirk and Spock determine where they are at the beginning of the episode when they hearĀ a radio broadcast about the upcoming “man-moon shot,” set to launch on that upcomingĀ Wednesday. This episode, of course, was broadcast in 1967, before Apollo 11 launched — which occurred onĀ Wednesday, July 16, 1969. Apollo 11, of course, was the mission that actually sent men to the moon.

So, while I might have dinged the creators for being too optimistic about man’s long-term progressĀ in spaaace, it’s pretty neat that they nailed it here, even if it was just a stroke of luck to pickĀ the actual day of the week of the launch two years later. Hat tip to our buddies atĀ Mission Log for pointing thisĀ very cool detail out.

Last point: This might be one of the very few time-travel episodes reviewed on this site. That’s not because we don’t like those episodes. But in many cases, the metaphorical reset button shows up, meaning the events aren’t historically relevant because they didn’t actually happen. That’s not really the case in this episode — Kirk’s crew retains memories of the events. Still,Ā it was the episode of TOS that gave us the most pause to include in this project.

ā€œBalance of Terrorā€

Star_TrekBOT
“I can’t figure out why there’s a camera right here. Guess I’ll call tech support …”

The Romulan Star Empire — a mysterious former nemesis of Earth unheard fromĀ for a century — returns and destroys several border outposts with a mysterious and super-scary weapon. The Enterprise responds and has protracted battle sequences (think submarine warfare ā€¦ in space!) before Kirkā€™s tactical genius bests Spockā€™s dad — err, the Romulan commander (Mark Lenard) — and destroys the invading ship preventing another war and cementing our boy Jimmy as, well, our boy Jimmy. Heā€™s apparently of a kind. And a sorcerer!

Why itā€™s important

ā€œBalance of Terrorā€ introduces one of Trekā€™s main villains, the Romulans, and does so in a way that is amazingly consistent with what we see of them for the next 40 years — unlike, say, the Ferengi, who go from allegedly eating their enemies to caterers and bartenders in six years flat. Of course, the episode also has the big reveal that the Romulans are offshoots of the Vulcans and introduces the concept of the cloaking device to Star Trek. It’s an extremely foundational hour of the franchise. Just think if that racist dude Stiles (Paul Comi), the Enterprise’sĀ navigator inĀ this episode whose ancestors fought and died in the previous conflict with the Romulans, had stuck around!

asdfasdfasd
“Just a second, Enterprise. I need to make sure you get video from me even after myĀ outpost is destroyed.”

What doesn’t hold up well

The previous conflict with the Romulans as stated by Spock and others, is too Earth-centric even for first-season TOS standards — and especially if you consider the events of ā€œStar Trek: Enterpriseā€ (but even if you don’t). Apparently, Earthā€™s war with the Romulans occurred after the coalition that would become the Federation wasĀ established in Enterprise’s final episode “These Are the Voyages ā€¦” but before the Federation itself wasĀ formed. Or something.

Dramatically, itā€™s interesting in “Balance of Terror” that the Romulans have never been seen by humans (and it sets up the Big Momentā„¢ when Spock sees a dude who looks just like his pops on the viewscreen — even though we don’t see Mark Lenard playing Sarek until season two). But itā€™s hard to believe that no visual communication or prisoner taking was previously possible, based on the 22nd-century technology on ā€œEnterprise,ā€ to say nothing of the visual communications technology available in the real world in the 21st century. Itā€™s too bad that Spock didnā€™t just say that the Romulans refused visual communication back in the day. That would have been more believable than the apparent lack of Skype on Romulus or Earth 150 years from now. Maybe the Romulans were just way into Snapchat?

ā€œEnterpriseā€ also later pisses all over the wonderment of the cloaking device by giving Jonathan Archerā€™s crewā€™s a clear understanding of the technology and knowledge that the Romulans (and others) use it. ā€œSelective bending of light,ā€ indeed, Mr. Science Officer.

Lastly, the bad science of TOS pops up by asserting that the Romulans are a real threat despite their vesselā€™s lack of warp drive. Maybe Romulans have warp (even though the Bird of Prey seen in this episode doesnā€™t) making the Romulans a threat to the Federation in a larger sense, as opposed to being on par with the goofy aliens from TNG’s ā€œThe Outrageous Okona.ā€ But the cat-and-mouse game is undercut by the fact that the Enterprise should be able to outrun the Romulan vessel several times over.

stiles
“My bigotry is too big for my quarters. Sir.”

Final thoughts

Complaints aside, itā€™s possible that this episode set up the very idea of recurring villains in Star Trek, a huge, huge deal. Soon after, the Klingons were introduced, and the two main rivals of TOS were set (with all due respect to a certain dude in a certain rubber lizard suit and Harcourt Fenton Mudd). Beyond that, ā€œBalance of Terrorā€ is fascinating because itā€™s willing to show actual bigotry (from a 23rd-century human!) as a way to show why bigotry is wrong and something humanity was still working to moveĀ past (and mostly succeeding). Itā€™s very effective, but itā€™s also unusual for Trek and would have been unheard of in TNG, when all humans were apparently beyond such things.

ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€

Star_Trek_Corbo
“I hope you relish my very weird upcoming acting career as much as I.”

On a routine mapping mission (stand by to photograph!) a strange cube blocks the Enterpriseā€™s path. Forced to destroy the cube, the Enterprise continues on, until it encounters a massive ship and its hostile commander, Balok. Unable to convince him that theyā€™re on a peaceful mission and with the crew facingĀ destruction, Kirk bluffs Balok into thinking the Enterprise has within it a substance called ā€œcorbomite,ā€ which would create an equal reaction to any force used against the Enterprise. Balok falls for it and rather than blowing up the Enterprise sends a smaller ship to tow itĀ to a base. But the Enterpriseā€™s engines overpower the smaller ship, leaving itĀ helpless. Kirk tells his surprised crew he plans to render aid to Balok — in one of the benchmark moments of the series, if not the franchise — and encounters an alien no bigger than a small child (Clint Howard). The Balok the Enterprise had seen was a puppet and the whole encounter a test. Balok then welcomes Kirk aboard in a moment of true Trek diplomacy. I hope you relished it as much as I.

corbo1
“Did you hear the joke I made earlier about being a doctor and not being a moon-shuttle conductor, Jim? It’s this running gag I’m trying to get going.”

Why itā€™s important

I consider ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€ the third pilot, as it really gets to the core message of Star Trek more than ā€œThe Cageā€ or ā€œWhere No Man Has Gone Beforeā€. Kirk, after facing apparent death at the hands of Balok, offers him assistance — after making speeches about how the Enterprise is in space to explore and meet new lifeforms. This episode is the pure ethos of Star Trek and why mankind builds starships. Good stuff.

Of course, we also meet Bones (DeForest Kelley) and Uhura (Nichelle Nichols) in this episode and the uniforms and set take on the look we see for most of the next three seasons (though Uhura is wearing a gold uniform, for some reason). We also see the shipā€™s phasers fire for the first time and Sulu at the helm. Other than the absence of Chekov (who shows up in season 2) what we see here is pretty much what TOS was for the next threeĀ years.

"I'd really like to get out of this whole First Federation thing and settle down somewhere. Maybe make a little extra cash by showing up in the second-season credits. You know, a cushy retirement gig."
“I’d really like to get out of this whole First Federation thing and settle down somewhere. Maybe make a little extra cash by showing up in the second-season credits. You know, a cushy retirement gig.”

What doesn’t hold up well

Spockā€™s still not quite right, though the evolution of the character is starting. Itā€™s also odd that we never hear of Balok or his First Federation again. Of course, this episode was during the era when the Enterprise was pretty clearly an Earth vessel and not a Federation ship. The United Federation of Planets wouldnā€™t be introduced for several more episodes.

Oh, and itā€™s kind of odd that Kirk leaves Bailey (Anthony D. Call) — his navigator who cracks up during the encounter with Balok — behind on Balokā€™s ship without really knowing more about Balok. What if Bailey couldnā€™t eat the foods Balok could provide? Can Bailey live on Tranya alone?

Final thoughts

This isnā€™t a perfect episode, as the shipboard action gets repetitive and there are some clear editing mistakes. But it is necessary viewing, as it really explains what the hell humans are doing out in space in the first place. It’s really too bad thatĀ this episode wasn’t shown in the original broadcast order until much later in the original run.

Even if the Star Trek ethos can be gleaned from other episodes — Kirk tries to render similar assistance to fallen enemies in ā€œBalance of Terrorā€ and even in ā€œStar Trek III: The Search for Spockā€ — the introduction of Kelley as McCoy is hugely important. A big part of the popularity of the original series has to do with the Big Three of Kirk, Spock and McCoy. Itā€™s interesting that Shatner and Kelley both were so comfortable in their roles so early in their time on Star Trek. The scene in Kirkā€™s quarters where they discuss Bailey hardly seems like something that occurred in their first episode together.

We do see some shipboard action in ā€œThe Cageā€ and ā€œWhere No Man Has Gone Before.ā€ But both of those episodes could have worked (more or less) just as well in more generic science fiction. ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€ is vintage Star Trek, as we learn a lot about what humans (or, at least the humans we see) are all about in Star Trek.

ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€ is the show’s philosophical pilot, rounding out ā€œThe Cageā€ as Star Trekā€™s aesthetic pilot, andĀ ā€œWhere No Man Has Gone Beforeā€ as the adventure pilot. Hence the decision to release the reviews of all three on the launch of this site.

ā€œWhere No Man Has Gone Beforeā€

Star_Trek_Where_No
“Accuracy when it comes toĀ middle initials is for men, not gods.”

The Enterprise, under the command of James Kirk (William Shatner) attemptsĀ to cross the barrier between galaxies with disastrousĀ results. The ship is badly damaged and Kirkā€™s old friend and navigator Gary Mitchell (Gary Lockwood) starts displaying weird powers (silver eyes, increased reading abilities, telekinesis, love of bad poetry) and a dangerous god complex. Kirk and Spock hatch a plan to cannibalize parts to repair the Enterprise from a nearby unmanned lithium-cracking station and to maroon Mitchell there. With the ship repaired, Mitchell escapes imprisonment on the planet and takes with him Dr. Elizabeth Dehner (Sally Kellerman), who was affected in a similar way to Mitchell but took longer to show symptoms. Kirk follows them and defeats and kills Mitchell, thanks to help from Dehner, who dies after the struggle. Kirk returns to the Enterprise and sets course for the shipā€™s next assignment.

Why itā€™s important

As the second pilot, this episode introduces Kirk, Scotty (James Doohan) and Sulu (George Takei), but itā€™s foundationalness (if thatā€™s a word) as far as events go is sort of borderline. Few concepts about Earth, the Federation, Starfleet, etc., are introduced here that arenā€™t in ā€œThe Cageā€. Most notable is probably talk of Starfleet Academy (where we learn Kirk was an instructor) which sort of underscores the idea of Starfleet as an exploratory/military-like service (along with the dialog about crossing the galactic barrier). Thereā€™s a general sense that humans explore the galaxy, but with few specifics — other than name dropping of some random planets and random stories re: alien ā€œrodent thingsā€ that attacked Kirk and Mitchell back in the day.

Everyone get in frame, someday some nerds are gonna need this photo for Internet!
Everyone get in frame, someday some nerds are gonna need this photo for Internet!

The episode does introduce Kirk, who is an important person in galactic history (Sulu and Scotty, as well, to a point). Itā€™s also an interesting sort of half-step between ā€œThe Cageā€ and ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€ (the first episode filmed in regular production). We see the original uniforms but the ship looks more like what we see throughout the series (the colors are MUCH less muted).

As noted in ourĀ review of ā€œThe Cage,ā€ this episode is Trekā€™s adventure pilot, because it sets up Kirk as the dashing hero (much more than Pike was in ā€œThe Cageā€). Apparently, that was the goal of the second pilot — to be less cerebral, and this episode does a better job of balancing the cerebral with action. Still, Kirk’s dialog withĀ Dehner about what Mitchell hasn’t learned in his accelerated progression to godhood is interesting stuff.

What doesn’t hold up well

The biggest issue is that this episode appears to take place well into the Enterpriseā€™s five-year mission — which runs counter to established Trek history that says this episode was at the beginning of the five years (which sort of explains the lack of McCoy and less of a buddy-buddy relationship for Kirk and Spock).Ā Also odd is theĀ familiarity among the crew and lines about how some of them have served together for years.

There are also lines of dialog — Mitchell saying a poem written in 1996 is from the ā€œpast couple of centuriesā€ — which show the creators hadnā€™t quite figured out a timeline for Star Trek. This is a problem for a lot of TOS, which seems to take place in the late 22nd century at some points (Kirk telling Khan in ā€œSpace Seedā€ that heā€™s been asleep for two centuries) and in the late 23rd at others (Kirkā€™s scenes with Dr. Taylor in ā€œStar Trek IV: The Voyage Homeā€). Itā€™s always been my theory that this stemmed from a belief, in the 1960s, that space exploration would be a lot farther along by the late 1990s than actually happened in real life — and the creators had to push back events accordingly.

Case in point: As the Enterprise gets close to the barrier, it finds the shipā€™s recorder from the S.S. Valiant, a vessel that apparently tried to leave the galaxy two centuries earlier (and ran into problems the Enterprise faces when it goes through the barrier). Do the math — this episode takes place in 2264 — meaningĀ weā€™ll apparently have ships fast enough to get to the galactic barrier sometime in the next 86 years or so. Even if we accept the ā€œStar Trek: First Contactā€ backstory, that humans travel faster than light in the 2060s, itā€™s just absurd to think weā€™d be traveling this far in the subsequent decades (and it certainly runs counter to ā€œStar Trek: Enterprise,” in which humans don’t really leave the solar system until the 2150s).

But, as I said, the creators in 1966 probably thought weā€™d be a lot farther along with space exploration by now than we are — and probably never figured that, nearly 50 years later, geeks like me would be dissecting stuff at this level.

Of course, the other part of this problem stems from the issue of distance, something TOS really shrugged off most of the time with a wink and a nod. Even if you figure the Valiant somehow got to the galactic barrier in the late 21st century (wormhole, maybe?) the whole idea of the Enterprise making it there doesnā€™t hold up to scrutiny. This is just bad science, and we see it throughout TOS and in the movies.

Can't get enough of that lithium, baby
I’m not gonna crack! Except on Delta Vega, that’s all anyone does with lithium there.

And letā€™s say the Enterprise can get to the galactic barrier using conventional warp. How is there an unmanned lithium-cracking station so close — within reach on impulse — to the galactic barrier, which is, put another way, the edge of the galaxy? Are the unmanned ore ships that go there ā€œevery 20 yearsā€ according to Kirk really fast enough to get there — and for it to be worth it? Earth must really dig that lithium.

The Milky Way sure seems larger (appropriately so) in second-generation Trek.

Now, some of you — if youā€™re not trying to find a way to retcon this stuff — are saying Iā€™m being too hard on a pilot. But the speed/distance problem is something that occurs throughout TOS and even in the movies (remember how absurdly easy it was to get to the center of the galaxy in ā€œStar Trek V: The Final Frontierā€?). Iā€™m simply pointing it out here to note where this issue started. Heck, it sort of started in dialog in “The Cage”, but it’s far more obvious and a lot more specific here.

Of course, a lot of the characterization is off in this episode. Kirk is pretty much the same guy we see throughout the series, but Spock isnā€™t Spock quite yet. Besides the smiling we see here and in ā€œThe Cageā€, he acts more like Worf in TNG than Spock in TOS. The cold, calculating belief that Mitchell should be killed to save the ship runs counter to the Spock we see later in the first season, when he believes killing the Horta in ā€œDevil in the Darkā€ would be a crime against science. Some of the dialog from Dehner could have come from Spock later in the series. Indeed and some of the dialog from Kirk could have come from McCoy (ā€œCan you take a moment to feel?ā€).

There are a few other stray items. It’s well-known that Kirk’s middle initial is “T” for “Tiberius.” But his initial appears asĀ ā€œRā€ onĀ the tombstone Mitchell makes for him (I’ve heard it suggested that Mitchell really wasn’t that infallible). Meanwhile, Sulu’s use of pennies in his analogy for Mitchellā€™s evolution was odd. I know there are disputes over whether money was still used in the 23rd century, but itā€™s pretty clear that hard currency was no longer used, Oh, and the medical reports Spock reviews for Mitchell and Dehner look extremely antiquated.

Iā€™d say ā€œWhere No Man Has Gone Beforeā€ is the adventure pilot, while ā€œThe Cageā€ is Star Trekā€™s aesthetic pilot, and ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€ is the philosophical pilot.Ā Hence the decision to release the reviews of all three on the launch of this site.

ā€œThe Cageā€

Star_Trek_The_Cage
“I played Jesus one time, you know.”

The U.S.S. Enterprise, under the command of Christopher Pike (Jeffrey Hunter) responds to a distress call from an Earth survey vessel inĀ an unexploredĀ system. The initially friendly and grateful survivors turn out to be illusions created by an advanced race of aliens called the Talosians. Their goal is to get Pike to accept a new life and mate with a human female named Vina by way of a series of elaborate fantasies — one including Vina as a very saucy Orion slave girl, another a recreation of the Enterpriseā€™s previous mission, etc. After Pike repeatedly refuses to cooperate, attacks the Talosians and threatens to kill himself and others, the Talosians let him go — deciding humans are too violent and too against captivity to repopulate their battered planet (the inconsistently smart/dumb actions by the Talosians is one of the episode’s weaknesses). Vina, who actually was one of the original humans from the ship that crashed and not an illusion, was left deformed (her beauty throughout the episode was an illusion created by the Talosians) and decides to remain on the planet with a fantasy Pike. The real Pike returns to the ship and sets course for the crewā€™s next mission, never to return to Talos IV. Oh, wait …

Why itā€™s important

Our first look at the USS Enterprise
The first Enterprise! No bloody A, B, C or D… or E, or NX.

It goes without saying that ā€œThe Cageā€ is the most foundational episode of all of Trek. Weā€™re introduced to so much that explaining it all would take too long. But, the big items include the Enterprise itself and the general look and feel of starships, a (somewhat) multi-ethnic crew with women (or, at least, a woman) in positions of authority and a main character whoā€™s an alien (Leonard Nimoy, appearing for the first time as Spock). Most importantly might be the idea that Earth is fine and has developed to the point where it has ships exploring and colonizing the galaxy. One of my favorite moments of the episode is the way the creators slipped that idea in — “Same old Earth andĀ you’ll see it very soon” — when Pike and Co. meet the ā€œsurvivorsā€ who ask if Earth’s all right. Whether intentional or not, the moment sets up the ā€œpositive futureā€ idea thatā€™s so core to Star Trek.

Naturally, some of the concepts arenā€™t fleshed out yet (thereā€™s no mention of Starfleet or the Federation). But they, of course, will come.

What doesn’t hold up well

Iā€™ll treat this one with extreme kid gloves. Use of paper and printers, a television set in Pikeā€™s quarters, etc., can mostly be shrugged off. Talk of printoutsĀ 23 years later in ā€œEncounter at Farpointā€, OTOH ā€¦

Probably the biggest issue comes from the dialog surrounding the crashed survey vesselā€™s apparent lack of warp drive. One of Pikeā€™s crew tells the ā€œsurvivorsā€ on Talos IV that the ā€œtime barrierā€ has been broken — possibly, an allusion to warp. I suppose it could mean something else. Maybe in the previous 18 years, some other advancement happened that negated a ā€œtime barrierā€ that kept ships from going very, very fast at warp? Iā€™m sure thereā€™s some elaborate, expanded universe explanation, but it still doesnā€™t make much sense if you figure the survey vessel got to Talos IV in the first place. And thereā€™s no dialog to indicate it was a sleeper ship.

This is part of a larger issue that we see in a lot of TOS, where the galaxy seems extremely small and the creators donā€™t seem to understand (or care about) the difference between warp and impulse. Anyway, the survivors crashed 18 years prior to the events of this episode, and we know that humans had warp about 200 years before ā€œThe Cage,ā€ (based on events later in TOS and ā€œStar Trek: First Contactā€).

“Captain Pike, you shouldn’t have! They’re lovely. I’ve got a vase I’ll put them. It’s right next to my tenant of no emotion and dedication to pure logic.”

Lastly, Spock is, of course, way off in this episode. Heā€™s the only character we see again — and heā€™s not quite the Spock we know and love until about the 10th episode produced in the first season — but watching him smile when he and Pike find the blue floating leavesĀ is a really odd moment. Itā€™s sort of a classic moment, too. Sometimes, Star Trekā€™s mistakes are an interesting part of watching its evolution.

Final thoughts

Of course, many fans have only seen ā€œThe Cageā€ through the two-part ā€œThe Menagerie,ā€ where the pilotā€™s footage was reused in a flashback. Either way, what we see is sort of fascinating (to borrow a phrase).

Itā€™s quite odd that the pilot is so light on why humans are in space in the first place. Most of the character moments revolve around Pikeā€™s internal struggle about whether being a starship (or, spaceship, based on this episode’s dialog) captain is worth it to him after an incident that occurred prior to the episode, leaving some crew members dead and others injured. Once captured, thereā€™s a lot about humanityā€™s hatred for captivity. Itā€™s not bad stuff, but itā€™s not particularly introductory to Star Trek. We donā€™t get a lot of big picture info.

That said, a lot introduced here does become part of what we watched for the next 40 years (50 years, in reruns). The Enterprise design, transporters, weapons, uniforms, the way the ship works, etc., are all generally started here.

Iā€™d say ā€œThe Cageā€ is Star Trekā€™s aesthetic pilot, ā€œWhere No Man Has Gone Beforeā€ is the adventure pilot and ā€œThe Corbomite Maneuverā€ is the philosophical pilot.Ā Hence the decision to release the reviews of all three on the launch of this site.